AuthorMonique ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Mac Vs Pc For Running Adobe Premiere10/26/2021
Both tools are powerful video editors with more features than the average person will ever use.Apple’s M1 chip is still turning heads when it comes to its performance. It includes the desktop (Mac or Windows) version as well as a mobile app counterpart. Adobe Premiere Pro is available with any Creative Cloud subscription or a la carte for 20.99 per month.
Vs Pc For Running Adobe Premiere Software That IsFilmmaker Max Yuryev is among those taking a deep look at video editing performance on the M1 Macs and took the time to compare a 13” MacBook Pro to the latest Razer Book 13 with Intel’s 11th-gen processors. But compared to a typical desktop workstation from Puget Systems that is around 2-3x. From a performance standpoint, the new Apple M1 MacBooks do fairly well considering that they are using a complete processor based around the ARM instruction set and software that is likely not fully optimized yet. In short, crap software will be crap on any machine, whether it is a PC or a Mac.Conclusion: Apple M1 MacBooks vs PC Desktop. One of the big names in video editing, Adobe, just released a beta for Premiere Pro that should show off some of these improvements.Badly-written applications randomly crashing, (Adobe Premiere Pro CC, Photoshop CC, Lightroom CC, and other third-party apps) and Adobe compatibility issues with the latest Mac OS, to name a few.The Mac does have a higher price point to go along with double the SSD storage, however, Yuryev points out that if he went with a matching SSD size in the MacBook it would actually come out $100 cheaper than the Razer. As for the exact models, the 13” MacBook Pro has:These are quite close on paper. The user interface in Windows. Personally, I prefer using a PC for serious work productivity, such as when Im using the Adobe Creative Suite. ![]() The Mac jumped off to an early lead and the Razer… crashed. Compared to a 2019 Mac Pro that took 4:30 this is all impressive performance for a laptop.DaVinci also has an M1-optimized version of Resolve out and so Yuryev moved there for the same stabilization test. The MacBook completed the task in 3:06 and the Razer took 4:21. Snes emulator mac 1013Dropping the preview to half-res did solve the playback issue on the Razer, so it is still very usable.Moving on to an export test using the same footage in Premiere Pro. The Razer on the other hand has plenty of dropped frames here. The Mac maxes out its graphics but appears to show smooth footage. The footage is the same 4K footage we were looking at earlier with an added note that there are two LUTs applied plus some film grain. Seems like an advantage should remain for the Mac in Resolve.Playback in Premiere is the next test. ![]() This showed even more improvement over Resolve and Premiere, which shouldn’t really be a surprise as Apple’s integration with their hardware has always been the best. Yuryev also points out the Razer’s fan kicked to full gear and is noticeably loud.If you are looking to use Final Cut or see how it compares to the other optimized app Yuryev did do an export test. Considering earlier Geekbench tests didn’t show this much of a difference, this might come down to the hardware video encoders and decoders on the chips.Sticking with Resolve for a moment to do the playback test, again the Mac is smooth while the Razer struggles hard with it, dropping a majority of frames. Now that the usage is equivalent between the two computers we should see a more reasonable comparison.And even still, the M1 Mac exports the file in 4:55 while the Razer is way behind at 9:02. Blackmagic seems to be doing a better job with Resolve.When Yuryev moves to Resolve, the Razer’s GPU usage finally shoots up to max meaning it is maximizing performance for the export. And, Final Cut is down to just 2:25.The M1 chip is a game-changer for computers. Resolve showed the same thing with export times of 3:40 on the Mac and 8:40 on the MacBook. The Mac, again, was smooth, and the Razer only had some minor stuttering, which was dramatically better than the previous tests.In a surprise twist, in Premiere with H.265 footage both machines actually worked faster than with H.264—it might be time to upgrade your PC to make use of this.For exports, both were faster than before with Premiere delivering the file in 7:28 on the MacBook and 11:01 on the Razer. With the increased number of cameras shipping with H.265 and increased support for computers and programs Yuryev did take a quick look and surprisingly saw even better performance playing the footage back.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |